Skip to content
SOPCam AI
InvestorsApply for a controlled pilot

Operational knowledge, governance and transition assurance

Turn operational knowledge into enterprise intelligence.

Capture operational expertise. Govern procedures. Train teams. Assure transitions. Manage compliance evidence. Build meaningful reports. Preserve institutional knowledge — as one connected platform, not six separate tools.

Apply for a controlled pilotRequest an enterprise demoTake the product tour
Pre-launch, stated plainly. The capabilities on this site are built and tested in our code unless marked otherwise. None is in production customer use yet; we are looking for the first pilot organisations.
01 CaptureSource recording REC-0417One narrated run of the month-end reconciliation12 min 40 s
02 GovernProcedure REC-0417 · revision 3Corrected, attested and approved by its owner; publishedapproved
03 TrainTraining on revision 3Assessed and verified alongside a supervisorverified
04 TransitionTransition case TC-0088Four of four responsibilities demonstrated; signed offsigned off
05 ComplyObligation OB-031 · evidenceEvidence records naming the procedure, the training and the sign-offevidenced
06 ReportReport · procedure and training readinessEvery figure traced to its records (transition and compliance reporting: not built yet)traceable

Fictional records. An illustration of how the platform connects, not a screenshot.

Report: Every figure traced to its records (transition and compliance reporting: not built yet).

The problem

Most operational knowledge lives in people, not in systems.

Organisations run on procedures that a few experienced people carry in their heads. It works until someone moves on, a site drifts, or an auditor asks for evidence. The cost is real; we will not invent a number for it.

Where it breaksWithout a governed recordWith SOPCam
ExpertiseLives in a few people. When one of them moves on, it leaves with them.Captured from the work itself and turned into an approved procedure with an owner.
ProceduresSeveral versions in circulation; nobody is sure which one a site is following.One approved revision in use at a time; a newer one supersedes it everywhere.
TrainingAttendance is recorded; whether it landed, and on which version, is not.Assessed and verified against the exact revision, with a certificate that names it.
HandoversA meeting, a shared folder and a hope.A case where each responsibility is demonstrated and an independent manager signs off.
AuditsA scramble to reconstruct who decided what, and when.Obligations with their evidence attached, followable to the source records.

From one recording to an executive report

Six records, each built on the one before.

Read down the page and watch the record build. The point is not six features; it is that each one is evidence for the next.

01 CaptureSource recording REC-0417One narrated run of the month-end reconciliation12 min 40 s
02 GovernProcedure REC-0417 · revision 3Corrected, attested and approved by its owner; publishedapproved
03 TrainTraining on revision 3Assessed and verified alongside a supervisorverified
04 TransitionTransition case TC-0088Four of four responsibilities demonstrated; signed offsigned off
05 ComplyObligation OB-031 · evidenceEvidence records naming the procedure, the training and the sign-offevidenced
06 ReportReport · procedure and training readinessEvery figure traced to its records (transition and compliance reporting: not built yet)traceable

Fictional records. An illustration of how the platform connects, not a screenshot.

  1. 01 · Capture

    It starts with the work itself.

    An experienced person records one real run of a process and narrates the judgement calls. The recording is the source every later record points back to.

  2. 02 · Govern

    The recording becomes one approved procedure.

    A draft is proposed and traced to the recording; its owner corrects, attests and approves it. Only that revision is published, and it supersedes the last one everywhere.

  3. 03 · Train

    People learn exactly that revision.

    Training is assigned on the published revision, assessed, and verified in person. A certificate names the revision, so 'trained' always means trained on what is in use.

  4. 04 · Transition

    A handover is proved, not assumed.

    When someone moves on, a transition case lists their responsibilities. Each is demonstrated by the successor, and an independent manager signs off — never early.

  5. 05 · Comply

    Those records are the compliance evidence.

    Evidence for the obligation the process serves names its sources: the procedure revision, the training, the sign-off. An auditor follows each one to its record instead of reconstructing it.

  6. 06 · Report

    And the report is drawn from the record.

    A manager asks a question in plain words; the report is built only from records they may see, and every figure shows where it came from. Today that covers procedures, reviews, publications, training and evidence coverage. Reporting on transitions and compliance is the next step, and is not built yet.

Explore Report Studio DemoTake the product tour

One system, six steps

Each step produces a record the next step relies on.

That is the difference between a platform and a set of features: what you capture becomes what you govern, what you govern is what people train on, and all of it is the evidence a handover, an audit or a report is built from.

01 · Capture & Understand

Start from how the work is really done.

An expert records the task as they perform it, writes it down, or attaches the screenshots they already use. The narration is transcribed, and frames are drawn from the recording, so every later step can point back to its source.

The record
A source recording, its transcript and frames, held as governed media; restricted originals never leave it.
Who decides
The expert chooses what to capture. Nothing is recorded covertly; recording is always visible.
How capture works

What exists today

  • Video upload and media processing
    Media processing has been proven in tests, not yet on a deployed pilot environment.
    Built and tested
  • Multilingual transcription
    Transcription with a real provider has been proven in our test environment; recording the detected language is still being proven.
    Built and tested
  • AI-drafted procedure from a recording
    End-to-end generation with a live AI provider has not yet been proven. This is the next proof, not a shipped result.
    Built and tested
  • Structured authoring from many sources
    Built and tested
  • Guided screen capture with narration
    Built and tested, but not yet exercised with a real person's recording.
    Built and tested
  • Screenshots with redaction and highlights
    Built and tested
  • Captions, translation and language tracks
    Built and tested; recording the detected language of a real transcript is still being proven.
    Built and tested
  • Transcript correction with revision history
    On the roadmap

“Built and tested” means the capability exists in our code and passes its automated tests. It does not mean it is in production: no capability is in customer use yet, and we are looking for the first pilot organisations.

One scenario, end to end

An experienced lead is leaving a critical process. Follow her knowledge.

Eight steps at a fictional company, Northbridge Facility Services. The chips under each step show how far each capability it uses is built today.

Fictional scenario · illustrations, not product screenshots

Handover scenario: step 1 of 8, Asha records the month-end reconciliation she has run for six years.

  1. Asha records the month-end reconciliation she has run for six years.

    Asha Rao, finance operations lead, is moving to a new role in four weeks. She records the supplier reconciliation as she does it, narrating the judgement calls that live only in her head.

    • Video upload and media processingBuilt and testedMedia processing has been proven in tests, not yet on a deployed pilot environment.
    • Multilingual transcriptionBuilt and testedTranscription with a real provider has been proven in our test environment; recording the detected language is still being proven.
    • Guided screen capture with narrationBuilt and testedBuilt and tested, but not yet exercised with a real person's recording.
    Source recordingREC-0417 · source

    Supplier reconciliation — narrated

    12 min 40 sNarration: EnglishRecording visible to recorder

    • 02:14“First I pull the open items for the period, never the whole ledger…”
    • 04:51“Watch for credit notes posted twice — the supplier portal does that.”

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  2. The recording becomes a draft procedure, every step traced to its source.

    A draft of eleven steps is proposed from the transcript and frames. Each step links back to the moment in the recording it came from, and anything inferred rather than observed is marked.

    • AI-drafted procedure from a recordingBuilt and testedEnd-to-end generation with a live AI provider has not yet been proven. This is the next proof, not a shipped result.
    • Screenshots with redaction and highlightsBuilt and tested
    Draft procedureDRAFT · REV 3

    11 proposed steps

    • 02Match statements; flag duplicate credit notesfrom 04:51
    • 05Confirm the threshold with the controllerinferred
    Draft — awaiting owner review

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  3. The process owner corrects, attests and approves revision 3.

    Meera Iyer owns the procedure. She rewrites two steps, adds a warning about duplicate credit notes, attests to the result and approves it. Publication is a separate act; revision 2 is superseded everywhere.

    • Owner review and approvalBuilt and tested
    • Controlled publication, supersession and revocationBuilt and tested
    • Append-only decision ledgerBuilt and tested
    Review and approvalREV 3

    Owner: M. Iyer

    • 2 steps rewritten · 1 warning added
    • Attested and approved14 Oct 10:42
    • Published; rev 2 superseded14 Oct 11:05

    Ledger entry #2,118Chain verified

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  4. Daniel trains on exactly that revision.

    Daniel Okafor is assigned training on revision 3, completes the assessment and is verified by a supervisor doing the task alongside him. His certificate names the revision it covers.

    • Training assignments, assessments and certificatesBuilt and tested
    • QR access at the point of workBuilt and tested
    Training on REV 3ASSIGNMENT

    D. Okafor

    • Read the approved procedure
    • Assessment · 9 of 10 questions
    • Verified alongside a supervisor
    Internal certificate · covers REV 3

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  5. A transition case makes the handover explicit.

    The case lists six responsibilities, from the reconciliation itself to the quarterly supplier review. For each one, Daniel moves from learned to understood to demonstrated. Two system accesses are transferred and one is revoked, each recorded.

    • Transition cases and knowledge-transfer plansBuilt and tested
    • Successor readiness, demonstratedBuilt and tested
    • Access and custody recordsBuilt and tested
    Transition case TC-0088ACTIVE

    A. Rao → D. Okafor · internal transfer

    • R1Month-end reconciliation
    • R4Quarterly supplier review
    • A2Supplier portal administratortransferred
    • A3Bank file upload rolerevoked

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  6. An independent manager signs it off, and not a day early.

    Sign-off is refused while one responsibility is only learned, and the case says so in words. Once Daniel has demonstrated it, a manager outside Asha's line signs the case off. No one is rated.

    • Independent manager sign-off and handover reportBuilt and tested
    Independent sign-offTC-0088

    Signing off is not available yet

    R4 “Quarterly supplier review” is learned but not yet demonstrated.

    • R4 demonstrated · 22 Oct
    • Signed off by an independent manager23 Oct

    No rating storedAudited without free text

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  7. The control owner sees the evidence, not a promise.

    The monthly reconciliation is a registered obligation. Its evidence is the approved revision, Daniel's verified training and the signed-off case. When a deadline needs an exception, a second person decides it.

    • Obligations, calendar and evidence recordsBuilt and tested
    • Exceptions decided by someone elseBuilt and tested
    • Evidence and audit consoleBuilt and tested
    Obligation OB-031MONTHLY

    Supplier reconciliation control

    • Approved procedure REC-0417 rev 3evidence
    • Verified training · D. Okaforevidence
    • Transition case TC-0088 signed offevidence
    • Exception · decided by a second personrecorded

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

  8. The operations director reads a report built from all of it.

    A Report Studio report on handover readiness across finance operations shows each figure's provenance. Groups too small to report safely are suppressed rather than shown.

    • Report StudioBuilt and tested
    • Privacy-safe aggregationBuilt and tested
    Report StudioSAVED · REPRODUCIBLE

    Handover readiness — finance operations

    • Site A5 of 6
    • Site B4 of 4
    • Site CGroup too small to reportsuppressed

    Provenance shown per figureNo AI model called

    Illustration · fictional data · not a product screenshot

Two more scenarios

The same chain, other problems.

Multi-site facilities operation (fictional)

One standard across forty sites

  1. A head of operations approves one cleaning-validation procedure as the standard.
  2. Every site receives the same approved revision, in the languages its people work in.
  3. Supervisors verify the procedure at the point of work through a site QR code.
  4. A revision supersedes the old version at every site at once, and lists who trained on it.
  5. A dashboard shows procedure currency and training status by location.
  • Revisions, comparison and standardsBuilt and tested
  • Captions, translation and language tracksBuilt and testedBuilt and tested; recording the detected language of a real transcript is still being proven.
  • QR access at the point of workBuilt and tested
  • Recertification and retraining listsBuilt and tested
  • Operational dashboards across sitesBuilt and tested
Regulated administrative office (fictional)

Evidence before the auditor asks

  1. A compliance lead registers the obligations the office is accountable for.
  2. Each obligation is scheduled on a calendar with an owner.
  3. Evidence is recorded against it: the approved procedure, the training, the review.
  4. An exception is requested by one person and decided by another.
  5. The audit console follows any decision back to the records behind it.
  • Obligations, calendar and evidence recordsBuilt and tested
  • Exceptions decided by someone elseBuilt and tested
  • Evidence and audit consoleBuilt and tested
  • Append-only decision ledgerBuilt and tested

Who it serves

Different leaders, one operating record.

  • Chief operating officerOne standard way of working across sites, with evidence that it is the one being followed.
  • Chief information officerGoverned records with tenant, location and role scoping, enterprise sign-in, and an append-only decision trail.
  • Chief people officerHandovers that are proved rather than assumed — without scoring, ranking or watching people.
  • Compliance and riskObligations, evidence and exceptions decided by a second person, in one place an auditor can follow.
  • Operations and site leadersProcedures people can find at the point of work, in their language, with training that is verified.
  • Frontline teamsClear steps on their own phone. Nothing to install, and no one scoring their day.

Where it applies

Cross-industry by design. No industry forks.

The same platform serves any operation that depends on repeatable work done well. These are illustrations of where it applies; they do not imply customer deployments, certifications or regulatory approval in any industry.

Industries and use cases
  • IT and technology operationsRunbooks, change procedures, on-call handovers
  • ManufacturingChangeovers, quality checks, line-side work instructions
  • Healthcare administrationFront-office and records procedures (no clinical claims)
  • Financial and professional servicesClose processes, reconciliations, client onboarding
  • Facilities and multi-site operationsCleaning validation, site standards, contractor induction
  • Hospitality and retailOpening and closing, service standards, new-joiner training
  • Logistics and field servicesDispatch, inspections, offline procedures in the field

Where we are, precisely

Built, tested, and honest about the rest.

Every capability on this site is checked against our internal requirement record before it can be shown. Here is the count, and the facts that matter more than the count.

See every capability and its status
Capabilities described on this site, by status
PillarBuilt and testedOn the roadmap
Capture & Understand71
Govern & Standardise52
Train & Enable51
Transition & Assure41
Comply & Prove42
Report & Improve41
All298
Customers in production
None yet.
Pilots
Open to a small number of first organisations; each needs founder approval and written terms.
Certifications
None held, and none claimed.
AI drafting
Built and tested; end-to-end generation with a live AI provider is still to be proven.

How it behaves

Four principles we design against.

  1. 01AI proposes. People decide.A model may draft or suggest; approval, publication and sign-off are always a named person's act.
  2. 02No surveillance, no scoring.Recording points at the work, not at a person's day. Nobody is ranked on productivity, and transitions store no rating.
  3. 03Fail closed.When identity, access, media or evidence is uncertain, the answer is no — with the reason in words.
  4. 04Evidence over claims.Every decision leaves a record. This website follows the same rule: it says what is built, what is not, and what is proven.

Three ways in

Choose the conversation you came for.

Organisations

A controlled pilot

A bounded engagement on one or two processes, with success criteria agreed up front. Approved by the founder, under written terms; never automatic access.

Apply for a controlled pilotContact sales
Investors

The opportunity, plainly stated

The problem, the product, the first market, and exactly where the company is today.

Investor inquiry
Everyone

See it working

Four guided journeys — SOP creation, transition assurance, compliance evidence and Report Studio — on fictional data, with every simulated action labelled.

Take the product tour